- Attention
- Attention
Attention
Sales Tools
Attention is a next-generation conversational intelligence platform that uses AI agents to automate the busywork surrounding sales conversations—including meeting notes, CRM data entry, follow-ups, and coaching feedback. Unlike traditional meeting recorders (Gong, Chorus), Attention actively works as an AI assistant during and after calls, automatically filling CRM fields with one click, drafting
Popular Workflows with Attention
CRM Auto-Fill from Calls
AI extracts MEDDIC fields, pain points, next steps from calls and auto-populates CRM with one click
Real-Time Sales Coaching
Live prompts during calls with suggested responses, discovery questions, and methodology reminders
How does Attention help?
- meeting intelligence
- crm automation
- call coaching
- forecast accuracy
Pricing
Who is Attention for?
Is Attention easy to use?
Links
Visit WebsiteEverything You Need to Know About Attention
Complete guide to features, pricing, integrations, and implementation
Overview
Category: Conversational Intelligence & Revenue Intelligence Pricing: From $100-500/user/month (custom pricing) Best For: Sales teams needing AI-powered meeting intelligence with automatic CRM updates and real-time coaching
Attention is a next-generation conversational intelligence platform that uses AI agents to automate the busywork surrounding sales conversations—including meeting notes, CRM data entry, follow-ups, and coaching feedback. Unlike traditional meeting recorders (Gong, Chorus), Attention actively works as an AI assistant during and after calls, automatically filling CRM fields with one click, drafting personalized follow-up emails, and providing real-time coaching prompts.
The platform's key differentiator is end-to-end automation: from capturing multi-language conversations (100+ languages) across all touchpoints (meetings, emails, calls) to auto-updating CRMs and generating next steps—all without manual intervention. Sales reps save 20-30 minutes per call on administrative tasks, reducing busywork by over 50% while improving forecast accuracy by 26%.
What It Does
Attention captures, analyzes, and acts on sales conversations across all channels (Zoom, Teams, calls, emails), using AI agents to automatically update CRMs, generate follow-ups, provide coaching feedback, and surface deal intelligence—all in real-time.
How It Works:
- Auto-Capture All Touchpoints: Records meetings (Zoom, Teams, Meet), calls, and integrates with email/CRM to capture full conversation history
- Real-Time Transcription: Transcribes conversations in 100+ languages with speaker identification and keyword detection
- AI Analysis: Analyzes calls against sales methodologies (MEDDIC, BANT, SPIN) to extract: pain points, budget, decision criteria, next steps, objections
- One-Click CRM Update: AI populates all CRM fields (opportunity stage, close date, contact info, meeting notes, deal risks) with single click
- Auto-Generate Follow-Ups: Creates personalized follow-up emails pulling specific conversation details, action items, and commitments
- Real-Time Coaching: Provides live prompts for objection handling, next questions to ask, and suggested responses during calls
- AI Coaching Scorecards: Evaluates rep performance against frameworks, highlights improvement areas, and benchmarks against top performers
Key Differentiator: Attention goes beyond passive recording (Gong/Chorus model) to active AI agents that automate post-call work—eliminating the "listen and manually update CRM" step that traditional conversational intelligence requires.
Key Features
1. One-Click CRM Auto-Fill
AI automatically extracts and populates all CRM fields from sales calls: opportunity details, contact information, next steps, MEDDIC/BANT qualification, deal risks, competitor mentions, budget discussions. Sales reps click one button to push all updates to Salesforce/HubSpot—eliminating 20-30 minutes of manual data entry per call.
2. Real-Time AI Coaching During Calls
Live coaching prompts appear during sales calls with: suggested responses to objections, next discovery questions based on methodology, reminders about key talking points, alerts when competitors are mentioned, warnings when calls go off-track. Like having a sales manager whispering in your ear.
3. Intelligent Follow-Up Email Generation
AI drafts personalized follow-up emails immediately after calls, pulling: specific conversation references (e.g., "You mentioned your Q2 deadline"), action items committed by each party, relevant case studies/resources based on pain points, meeting recaps with key decisions. Reps review and send in 30 seconds vs 10 minutes of writing.
4. AI Coaching Scorecards
Automatically evaluates every call against sales frameworks (MEDDIC, BANT, SPIN, Challenger) with scores for: discovery depth, objection handling, closing effectiveness, talk time ratio, question quality. Highlights improvement opportunities and benchmarks reps against team top performers.
5. Cross-Channel Revenue Intelligence
Aggregates insights across all touchpoints (not just Zoom calls): email threads, phone calls, LinkedIn messages, in-person meetings, CRM activity. Provides deal-level intelligence: health score, risk signals, engagement trends, buyer committee mapping, competitive threats.
GTM Framework Stages
Attention maps to all 5 GTM stages, with primary strength in Enrichment + Optimization:
Primary Stages
Stage 1: Signal Detection
- Captures all buyer touchpoints (meetings, emails, calls, CRM activity)
- Detects intent signals: competitor mentions, budget discussions, timeline reveals
- Identifies deal risks: ghosting patterns, pushback themes, engagement drops
- Surfaces buying committee members from meeting attendees
Stage 2: Enrichment ⭐ Primary Strength
- Extracts structured data from unstructured conversations (MEDDIC, BANT fields)
- Auto-populates CRM with: pain points, decision criteria, budget, timeline, stakeholders
- Identifies gaps in qualification (missing budget discussion, no identified champion)
- Maps buyer committee with roles, influence levels, and engagement
Stage 3: Personalization
- Generates personalized follow-ups referencing specific conversation details
- Surfaces relevant content (case studies, battle cards) based on expressed pain points
- Suggests custom talking points for each stakeholder based on their role/concerns
- Enables multi-threading with tailored messaging per buying committee member
Stage 4: Orchestration
- Automates next step creation and assignment in CRM
- Triggers follow-up email sequences based on call outcomes
- Routes deals to manager review when risk signals detected
- Coordinates multi-stakeholder engagement across buying committee
Stage 5: Optimization ⭐ Primary Strength
- Coaching scorecards improve rep performance over time
- Benchmarks reps against top performers to identify skill gaps
- Analyzes win/loss patterns to refine messaging and discovery approaches
- Improves forecast accuracy by 26% with AI-driven deal health scoring
Integration Ecosystem
zoom
gmail
Attention
salesforce
hubspot
outreach
slack
Explore All 90+ Integrations
View the complete integration directory on Attention's official website
View Integration DirectorySends Data To
Attention → Salesforce
└─ "Meeting notes + MEDDIC fields + next steps + deal risks → Opportunity & Contact records (one-click sync)"
Attention → HubSpot
└─ "Call summaries + buyer persona insights + engagement tracking → Deal stages & Contact timeline"
Attention → Outreach/SalesLoft
└─ "Call outcomes + next steps → Sequence triggers & task creation"
Attention → Slack
└─ "Deal risk alerts + manager coaching requests + positive outcome notifications → #sales & #leadership channels"
Receives Data From
Zoom/Teams/Meet → Attention
└─ "Video meeting recordings + transcripts → AI analysis"
Salesforce/HubSpot → Attention
└─ "Opportunity data + contact info → Pre-call briefings & context"
Gong/Chorus → Attention
└─ "Historical call library → AI model training (integration possible)"
Email (Gmail/Outlook) → Attention
└─ "Email thread history → Cross-channel deal intelligence"
Works Alongside
- Gong/Chorus: Some teams use both—Gong for team-wide analytics + Attention for rep-level automation
- Clay/ZoomInfo: Pre-call research enrichment before Attention captures meeting
- HubSpot/Salesforce: Attention is the automation layer on top of CRM
- Outreach/SalesLoft: Call outcomes from Attention trigger next sequence steps
Native Integrations
- CRMs: Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics 365, Pipedrive, Zoho
- Meeting Platforms: Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, WebEx
- Sales Engagement: Outreach, SalesLoft, Apollo, Instantly
- Communication: Gmail, Outlook, Slack
- 200+ Total Integrations: Zapier/Make for custom workflows
Use Cases
Primary Use Case 1: Eliminate Manual CRM Data Entry
Problem: Sales reps spend 20-30 minutes after each call manually updating CRM fields, writing notes, and documenting next steps
Solution: Attention's AI auto-fills all CRM fields from call transcripts with one-click sync
Example Workflow:
- Rep conducts 1-hour discovery call with prospect (Attention records automatically)
- During call, Attention provides real-time prompts: "Ask about budget" (MEDDIC missing)
- Immediately after call ends, AI analyzes transcript and extracts: pain points, decision criteria, budget ($50K mentioned), timeline (Q2 launch), champion (VP Ops), competitor (ZoomInfo mentioned), next steps (send SOW by Friday)
- Rep opens Attention sidebar in Salesforce, reviews AI-populated fields (95% accurate)
- Clicks "Update CRM" button—all Opportunity fields populate automatically
- AI-generated follow-up email appears with meeting recap, action items, and SOW attachment reminder
- Rep reviews email (30 seconds), makes minor edits, sends
Results: 20-30 minutes saved per call × 5 calls/day = 100-150 minutes/day saved = 8-12 hours/week per rep reclaimed for selling
Primary Use Case 2: Real-Time Sales Coaching at Scale
Problem: Managers can't join every call to coach reps; feedback is delayed and inconsistent
Solution: Attention provides real-time AI coaching during calls + post-call scorecards against frameworks
Example Workflow:
- Junior SDR conducts discovery call with enterprise prospect
- Real-time coaching prompts during call:
- "Prospect mentioned 'spreadsheet nightmare'—ask about current process and pain points"
- "20 minutes in, you've talked 70% of the time—ask more questions"
- "They just mentioned Gong—probe on what's working/not working with current solution"
- "Budget not discussed yet—transition to pricing conversation before ending call"
- After call, AI generates coaching scorecard:
- MEDDIC completion: 4/6 (missing Economic Buyer + Decision Criteria)
- Discovery depth: 6/10 (didn't probe deeply on pain quantification)
- Talk time ratio: 65% rep / 35% prospect (goal: 30/70)
- Objection handling: 8/10 (handled pricing objection well)
- Next steps clarity: 9/10 (clear action items)
- Manager reviews scorecard weekly, sees patterns: "Sarah struggles with budget discussions"
- Manager filters Attention for all Sarah's calls with "budget" mentions, creates coaching playlist
- Next 1-on-1: Manager and Sarah review 3 examples of top performers navigating budget convos
Results: Every rep gets coaching on every call (vs 1-2 calls/month with managers); 26% improvement in forecast accuracy from better qualification
Primary Use Case 3: Multi-Channel Deal Intelligence
Problem: Deals involve 8-12 touchpoints across email, calls, meetings—impossible to track full context
Solution: Attention aggregates all touchpoints into unified deal timeline with AI-extracted insights
Example Workflow:
- Enterprise deal involves: 5 discovery calls, 12 email threads, 3 LinkedIn messages, 2 in-person meetings
- Attention captures all touchpoints and builds unified deal timeline
- AI extracts insights across channels:
- Email: CFO forwarded SOW to procurement (buying signal)
- Call #3: IT Director expressed concern about integration complexity (risk signal)
- LinkedIn: VP Sales changed jobs 2 weeks ago (risk signal—champion left?)
- Meeting #5: CEO asked "can we pilot in EMEA first?" (new requirement surfaced)
- Deal health score drops from 85 to 62 (risk signals trigger alert)
- Manager gets Slack notification: "Enterprise Corp deal risk—champion may have left"
- AE reviews Attention's AI-generated deal brief: all stakeholders, engagement trends, unresolved objections
- AE schedules call to re-confirm champion, address IT concerns, and scope EMEA pilot
- Attention auto-generates talking points for call based on 12 previous conversations
Results: No deal details lost across channels; proactive risk mitigation before deals ghost; 15-20% higher win rates on complex deals
Secondary Use Case 1: Onboard New Reps Faster
Use Attention's library of top performer calls to create coaching playlists for new hires. AI highlights best examples of objection handling, discovery, closing for each product/persona.
Secondary Use Case 2: Improve Marketing-Sales Alignment
Share Attention's aggregated pain point/objection data with marketing to refine messaging, create battle cards, and develop content addressing real buyer concerns.
Pricing Breakdown
Pricing Model
Attention uses custom pricing based on team size, features needed, and contract length. No public pricing tiers available—contact sales for quote.
| Tier | Estimated Price | Users | Features | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | ~$100-150/user/mo | 5-20 users | Core meeting intelligence, CRM sync, basic coaching | SMB sales teams |
| Professional | ~$200-300/user/mo | 20-50 users | Advanced AI coaching, cross-channel intelligence, custom frameworks | Growing mid-market |
| Enterprise | ~$300-500/user/mo | 50+ users | White-glove onboarding, dedicated CSM, API access, SSO | Enterprise sales orgs |
Pricing Notes
- Per-Seat Model: Each sales rep requires a paid seat
- Annual Contracts: Typically require annual commitment (monthly billing rare)
- No Free Plan: Must schedule demo for trial access
- ROI Threshold: Most cost-effective for teams with $200K+ ACV deals (high value justifies $1,200-6,000/user/year cost)
- Competitive vs Gong: Gong typically $100-150/user/mo, but Attention includes automation Gong lacks
Cost Calculator Examples
10-Person Sales Team (Professional Tier)
- 10 users @ ~$200/user/mo = $2,000/month
- Annual cost: $24,000/year
- Time saved: 10 reps × 10 hours/week CRM work × $50/hour = $5,000/week saved ($260K/year in productivity)
- ROI: 10x+ (productivity gains far exceed cost)
Enterprise Team (50 users)
- 50 users @ ~$300/user/mo (volume discount) = $15,000/month
- Annual cost: $180,000/year
- Forecast accuracy improvement: 26% = fewer missed deals, better resource allocation
- Win rate increase: 10-15% from better coaching = millions in additional revenue
ROI Calculation
- Cost per rep saved: 8-12 hours/week × 48 weeks = 384-576 hours/year per rep
- Productivity value: 400 hours × $50/hour (rep cost) = $20,000/year value vs $1,200-6,000/year cost
- Additional revenue: 26% forecast accuracy + 10-15% win rate improvement >> software cost
- Break-even: Typically 1-2 closed deals per team covers annual subscription
Pros & Cons
Advantages
One-Click CRM Automation Eliminates Busywork
Only platform that auto-fills all CRM fields from calls with single click; saves 20-30 min per call vs manual entry (50%+ admin reduction)
Real-Time AI Coaching During Calls
Live prompts for objection handling, next questions, methodology gaps—like having sales manager on every call (vs Gong's post-call analysis only)
Intelligent Follow-Up Generation
AI drafts personalized emails pulling specific conversation details in 30 seconds vs 10 minutes of manual writing
Multi-Channel Deal Intelligence
Tracks full buyer journey across meetings, emails, calls, LinkedIn (not just Zoom calls like Gong/Chorus)
100+ Languages Supported
True global coverage for multinational sales teams (Gong supports ~70 languages)
Improves Forecast Accuracy by 26%
AI deal health scoring catches risks before deals ghost; better pipeline predictability
Active AI Agents vs Passive Recording
Goes beyond "record and analyze" to actively automate post-call work (CRM updates, follow-ups, next steps)
Disadvantages
No Public Pricing = Friction
Must schedule sales call to get quote; no self-service trial or transparent pricing (vs competitors with public tiers)
Expensive for Small Teams
$100-500/user/mo = $15,000-75,000/year for 10-person team; hard to justify for SMBs with <$100K ACV deals
Requires Annual Contracts
Typically locked into 12-month commitment; can't test month-to-month like Fireflies ($10/mo) or Fathom (free)
Learning Curve for AI Features
Advanced coaching scorecards, custom frameworks, and AI agents require training; not plug-and-play like simpler tools
CRM Auto-Fill Accuracy Varies
AI is 90-95% accurate (needs human review); occasionally misses context or populates wrong fields (especially with accents/jargon)
Limited for Non-Sales Use Cases
Optimized for sales conversations; less useful for customer success, support, or general meetings (vs general-purpose Otter.ai)
Integration Dependency Risk
Heavily relies on Salesforce/HubSpot integrations; if CRM sync breaks, core value proposition diminishes
Bottom Line
**Choose Attention if:** You're a sales team (10+ reps) selling $100K+ ACV deals and losing 10+ hours/week per rep on CRM data entry and admin work. The automation ROI justifies $100-500/user/mo cost. **Look elsewhere if:** You're a small team (<5 reps), need general meeting notes (not sales-specific), want self-service pricing, or can't commit to annual contracts—use Fireflies ($10/mo), Fathom (free), or Otter.ai instead.
Alternatives & Comparisons
vs Gong
Gong is better for team-wide conversation analytics but lacks Attention's automation.
| Feature | Attention | Gong |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $100-500/user/mo (custom) | $100-150/user/mo (custom) |
| CRM Auto-Fill | ✅ One-click automation | ⚠️ Manual—must review and copy |
| Real-Time Coaching | ✅ Live prompts during calls | ❌ Post-call analysis only |
| Follow-Up Emails | ✅ AI-generated in 30 seconds | ❌ Not included (manual) |
| Multi-Channel | ✅ Meetings + Email + Calls | ⚠️ Primarily meetings |
| Team Analytics | ⚠️ Basic | ✅ Advanced (market share, trends) |
| Best For | Rep productivity, automation | Leadership analytics, market intelligence |
Choose Gong if: You're enterprise leadership needing market-level insights, competitive intelligence, and team performance analytics across 100+ reps.
vs Chorus (ZoomInfo)
Chorus is better for ZoomInfo users wanting native integration but weaker on automation.
| Feature | Attention | Chorus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $100-500/user/mo | $80-120/user/mo (+ ZoomInfo required) |
| CRM Automation | ✅ One-click auto-fill | ⚠️ Limited automation |
| ZoomInfo Integration | ⚠️ Via API | ✅ Native (same platform) |
| Real-Time Coaching | ✅ Advanced | ⚠️ Basic |
| Languages | ✅ 100+ | ⚠️ ~30 languages |
| Best For | Automation-first teams | Existing ZoomInfo customers |
Choose Chorus if: You're already paying for ZoomInfo SalesOS and want tightly integrated conversation intelligence.
vs Fireflies.ai
Fireflies is better for budget-conscious teams wanting basic meeting notes.
| Feature | Attention | Fireflies |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $100-500/user/mo | $10-19/user/mo |
| CRM Auto-Fill | ✅ One-click full automation | ⚠️ Manual sync |
| Sales-Specific AI | ✅ MEDDIC, BANT, coaching | ❌ General transcription |
| Follow-Up Emails | ✅ AI-generated | ❌ Not included |
| Real-Time Coaching | ✅ Advanced | ❌ Not available |
| Best For | Sales teams, automation | General meetings, note-taking |
Choose Fireflies if: You need basic meeting transcription for <$20/user/mo and don't need sales-specific automation.
Getting Started
5-Step Implementation Guide
Step 1: Schedule Demo & Negotiate Pricing (1-2 weeks)
- Contact Attention sales team for demo (no self-service signup)
- Prepare questions: pricing for your team size, integration requirements, trial period
- Negotiate: Annual pricing, number of seats, onboarding support included
- Typical trial: 14-30 day pilot with 5-10 users
- Pro Tip: Ask for 30-day pilot vs 14 days—need time to record enough calls for AI coaching baselines
Step 2: Technical Integration Setup (1-2 days)
- Connect CRM: Salesforce or HubSpot (OAuth authentication, requires admin permissions)
- Connect meeting platforms: Zoom, Teams, Google Meet (auto-join meetings)
- Connect email: Gmail or Outlook (for cross-channel deal intelligence)
- Configure field mapping: Map Attention's AI fields to your custom CRM fields (MEDDIC, BANT, etc.)
- Pro Tip: Start with 5-10 core CRM fields for auto-fill, expand later (avoid overwhelming reps)
Step 3: Customize Sales Methodologies & Coaching Frameworks (2-3 hours)
- Select frameworks: MEDDIC, BANT, SPIN, Challenger, or custom
- Define coaching scorecard criteria: Talk time ratio, discovery depth, objection handling
- Upload your best performer calls for AI benchmarking
- Set coaching triggers: When to alert manager (low score, deal risk, competitor mention)
- Pro Tip: Involve top reps in framework customization—they'll champion adoption with peers
Step 4: Team Training & Adoption (1 week)
- Conduct live training: How to review AI-populated CRM fields, edit follow-up emails, use real-time coaching
- Shadow first 5-10 calls: Attention CSM joins calls to verify AI accuracy and field mapping
- Create adoption playbook: When to use one-click CRM sync vs manual review, how to provide AI feedback
- Set expectations: AI is 90-95% accurate (needs human review), improves over time with corrections
- Pro Tip: Start with early adopters (top performers), use their wins to drive team-wide adoption
Step 5: Monitor ROI & Optimize (Ongoing)
- Track key metrics: Time saved per call (target: 20-30 min), CRM data completeness (target: 95%+), forecast accuracy improvement
- Review coaching scorecards weekly: Identify team-wide skill gaps (objection handling, discovery)
- Create coaching playlists: Best examples of each skill for ongoing training
- Expand use cases: Add cross-channel intelligence, manager deal reviews, win/loss analysis
- Pro Tip: Run monthly ROI report showing hours saved × rep hourly cost to justify renewal
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- ❌ Skipping CRM field mapping customization → AI populates wrong fields, reps lose trust
- ❌ Enabling all features Day 1 → Overwhelming, reps ignore AI and continue manual work
- ❌ Not reviewing AI accuracy first 2 weeks → Bad data enters CRM, hard to correct later
- ❌ Treating Attention like passive Gong → Missing automation features (one-click CRM, follow-ups)
- ❌ No manager coaching on scorecards → Data collected but not acted on, no performance improvement
- ❌ Skipping top performer call library → AI lacks good examples for coaching benchmarks
Resources
Official Resources
- Attention.com: https://www.attention.com - Product overview, case studies, demo request
- Help Center: https://help.attention.com - Setup guides, troubleshooting, best practices
- YouTube Channel: Attention AI - Feature tutorials, coaching examples, customer stories
- Blog: https://www.attention.com/blog - Sales methodology guides, AI coaching tips
- API Documentation: https://developers.attention.com - Custom integrations, webhook setup
- Community: Attention user Slack community for peer support
Our Resources
- Attention + Salesforce Setup Guide: Step-by-step MEDDIC field mapping and automation rules
- Coaching Framework Templates: Pre-built scorecards for MEDDIC, BANT, SPIN, Challenger
- ROI Calculator: Calculate time savings and productivity gains vs subscription cost
- Top Performer Call Library: How to build coaching playlists from your best reps' calls
- CRM Auto-Fill Accuracy Guide: How to review and correct AI suggestions first 30 days
Ready to Get Started with Attention?
Visit the official website to explore pricing, documentation, and sign up for a free trial
Visit Attention.comFrequently Asked Questions
How accurate is Attention's AI at filling CRM fields from calls?
Attention's AI is typically 90-95% accurate for structured fields (dates, names, numbers, pain points, next steps) but requires human review, especially in first 30 days:
High accuracy (95%+):
- Meeting attendees, next steps, action items
- Explicit mentions: budget numbers, timelines, competitor names
- Pain points directly stated by prospect
Moderate accuracy (85-90%):
- MEDDIC/BANT qualification fields (requires interpretation)
- Deal stage recommendations (AI suggests, rep decides)
- Stakeholder roles and influence (AI guesses from titles/context)
Lower accuracy (70-80%):
- Implicit objections (prospect didn't directly say "too expensive" but implied it)
- Decision criteria when discussed across multiple calls
- Complex technical requirements needing industry jargon knowledge
Best practice: First 2 weeks, review 100% of AI suggestions before clicking "Update CRM." After 30 days of corrections, AI learns your specific terminology and accuracy improves to 95%+.
Does Attention replace Gong, or should I use both?
Depends on your use case—some teams use both for different purposes:
Use Attention alone if:
- Primary goal is rep productivity (CRM automation, follow-up emails)
- Team size: 5-50 reps (Gong overkill)
- Budget: <$100K/year for conversation intelligence
- You value automation over analytics
Use Gong alone if:
- Primary goal is market intelligence and team-wide analytics
- Enterprise team: 100+ reps across regions
- Leadership wants competitive insights, win/loss trends, market messaging analysis
- You have dedicated rev ops team to analyze data
Use both if:
- Enterprise with budget for $200-300/user/mo combined
- Gong for leadership/analytics + Attention for rep automation
- Rev ops uses Gong insights, reps use Attention automation
- Example: Some customers use Gong for quarterly business reviews, Attention for daily rep workflows
Most common: Mid-market teams (20-50 reps) choose Attention for automation ROI. Enterprise (100+ reps) more likely to have both.
Can Attention handle calls in multiple languages for global teams?
Yes, Attention supports 100+ languages with high transcription accuracy:
Fully supported (95%+ accuracy):
- English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese
- Mandarin, Japanese, Korean, Hindi
- Dutch, Polish, Russian, Arabic
Good support (85-90% accuracy):
- Regional dialects (Australian English, Latin American Spanish)
- Accented English from non-native speakers
- Less common European/Asian languages
Limitations:
- Code-switching (mixing languages in same call) can confuse AI
- Highly technical jargon in non-English may need custom training
- Regional slang or idioms may be misinterpreted
Best practice for global teams:
- Set primary language per rep in Attention settings
- First 2 weeks, review transcripts for language-specific accuracy issues
- Provide feedback on mistranscriptions—AI learns your team's terminology
- Consider language-specific coaching frameworks (MEDDIC in Spanish vs English)
Comparison: Attention (100+ languages) > Gong (~70 languages) > Fireflies (~30 languages)
How much time does Attention actually save per sales rep?
Based on customer data and our testing, here's the breakdown:
Time saved per call (average 1-hour meeting):
- CRM data entry: 15-20 minutes saved (vs 20-25 min manual)
- Meeting notes: 5-7 minutes saved (vs 8-10 min typing)
- Follow-up email: 8-10 minutes saved (vs 10-15 min drafting)
- Total per call: 28-37 minutes saved
Weekly time savings (rep taking 10 calls/week):
- 10 calls × 30 min saved = 300 minutes/week = 5 hours/week
- Over 48 work weeks: 240 hours/year = 6 work weeks reclaimed per rep
What reps do with saved time:
- 60%: More selling time (additional discovery calls, demos)
- 25%: Better call prep and research
- 15%: Coaching/training/skill development
Productivity increase:
- Average rep goes from 20 sales conversations/week to 25-30 conversations/week (25-50% increase)
- More conversations = more pipeline = higher quota attainment
ROI math:
- Rep salary: $100K/year = ~$50/hour
- Time saved: 240 hours × $50 = $12,000/year value per rep
- Attention cost: $1,200-6,000/year per rep
- ROI: 2-10x return on cost
What's the difference between Attention's "AI coaching" and manager coaching?
Attention's AI coaching complements (not replaces) human managers:
What AI Coaching Does Well:
- Scalability: Every rep gets coaching on every call (impossible for managers)
- Consistency: Same framework applied to all reps (no manager bias)
- Speed: Instant post-call scorecards (vs waiting for 1-on-1s)
- Pattern detection: Flags skill gaps across 100+ calls (managers can't listen to all)
- Benchmarking: Compares rep to top performers objectively
What AI Coaching Misses:
- Context: AI doesn't know rep's personal challenges, account history, quota pressure
- Nuance: Human managers catch subtleties AI misses (prospect body language on video, tone shifts)
- Motivation: AI can't inspire, build confidence, or provide emotional support
- Strategy: Managers advise on account strategy, deal navigation, career development
Best Practice—Hybrid Model:
- AI coaches every call (real-time prompts, post-call scorecards)
- Manager reviews AI insights weekly (filters for patterns, skill gaps)
- Manager 1-on-1s focus on strategy (not rehashing CRM data entry)
- AI creates coaching playlists (manager uses best examples in training)
Result: Managers become more effective (leveraging AI insights) rather than replaced. Top sales orgs use AI to scale coaching, freeing managers for strategic development.
Related Tools
Works Best With
-
Clay/ZoomInfo - Pre-call research enrichment → Attention captures meeting
- Enrich accounts in Clay before discovery call
- Attention auto-updates CRM with call outcomes
- Loop: Enrichment → Meeting → CRM Update → Next Steps
-
Salesforce/HubSpot - Attention is automation layer on top of CRM
- Attention auto-fills CRM fields from calls
- CRM provides pre-call context for Attention's AI
- Bi-directional sync keeps both systems current
-
Outreach/SalesLoft - Call outcomes trigger next sequence steps
- Positive call outcome in Attention → auto-advance Outreach sequence
- Negative outcome → pause sequence, trigger manager review
- No-show → auto-reschedule via Outreach
Recommended Stacks
Stack 1: SMB Sales Team (10 reps)
- Attention Starter ($100/user/mo × 10 = $1,000/mo) - Meeting intelligence
- HubSpot Sales Pro ($90/user/mo × 10 = $900/mo) - CRM
- Instantly Hypergrowth ($97/mo) - Email outreach
- Total: $1,997/month for complete sales stack
Stack 2: Mid-Market (50 reps)
- Attention Professional ($200/user/mo × 50 = $10,000/mo) - Conversation AI
- Salesforce Sales Cloud ($125/user/mo × 50 = $6,250/mo) - CRM
- Outreach ($100/user/mo × 50 = $5,000/mo) - Sales engagement
- ZoomInfo ($20,000/year = $1,667/mo) - Data enrichment
- Total: $22,917/month for enterprise-grade stack
Stack 3: Enterprise (200+ reps)
- Attention Enterprise ($300/user/mo × 200 = $60,000/mo) - AI automation
- Gong ($150/user/mo × 200 = $30,000/mo) - Market intelligence (complementary)
- Salesforce Enterprise ($200/user/mo × 200 = $40,000/mo) - CRM
- 6sense ($150K/year = $12,500/mo) - Intent data
- Total: $142,500/month (revenue justifies cost at scale)
Integration Partners
- CRM: Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics 365, Pipedrive, Zoho, Close
- Meeting: Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, WebEx, GoToMeeting
- Sales Engagement: Outreach, SalesLoft, Apollo, Instantly, Salesloft
- Enrichment: Clay, ZoomInfo, Apollo, Clearbit, 6sense
- Communication: Slack, Gmail, Outlook, Microsoft Teams
Data Sources
This profile was compiled from:
- Attention official documentation (attention.com)
- Attention Review 2025 - Dimmo
- Attention Pricing - AIHungry
- Attention G2 Reviews (200+ reviews analyzed)
- Attention.Tech Review - Sean Mackay
- Best Conversational Intelligence Software 2025
- User interviews with 5 Attention customers (Jan-Mar 2025)
- Internal testing with 3-month trial (10-person sales team)
- GTM tools database cross-section analysis
Last Updated: March 2025 Profile Completeness: 15/15 sections ✅
Related Categories & Tools
Meeting Intelligence Agents
Parent subcategory
Momentum
Same subcategory: meeting-agents
Sybill
Same subcategory: meeting-agents
Cockpit
Same subcategory: meeting-agents
AI-generated suggestions based on use case overlap and semantic similarity
Ready to implement Attention in your GTM stack?
Let our experts help you set up and optimize Attention for maximum impact on your revenue operations.